Campus ban on monarchy and protests angers students

A public university in northern Thailand has barred its students from holding any protest or gathering within the campus that mentions the Thai monarchy in any capacity, in a move seen by many students as an attempt to curb freedom of expression.

The development comes just two months after the Move Forward party that campaigned for monarchy reforms swept to victory at the polls, thanks to the support of many students and young voters.

Move Forward has pledged to reform the monarchy’s political powers and amend Thailand’s draconian lèse majesté law which effectively criminalises any action or speech seen as criticism against the Royal Family, with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison. The party is proposing to reduce the punishment and put a limit on who can file complaints under the law.

Against this backdrop, Chiang Mai University’s administration said in a statement that its new rules, unveiled on 3 July and which also require students to seek permission before holding any protests, upholds students’ rights to peaceful gathering while safeguarding safety and order on campus.

However, a student activist group based at the university, called SAAP 24:7, said that the restrictions “infringe upon academic freedom and freedom of expression, without any regard for the principles of public space and constitutional rights to assembly”.

The group is also collecting student signatures to petition for the measures to be reversed.

“The university must urgently review and adjust its policies on the management of public spaces,” SAAP 24:7 said at the launch of the petition campaign on 6 July, adding that “members of the Chiang Mai University community must be allowed to participate in the designing of such policies”.

Policing the protests

While the university announcement stated the administration respects “rights, liberty and responsibility to assembly under the boundary of the Constitution and the law”, it went on to list a number of restrictions on campus protests and gatherings.

For instance, students must secure approval from the administration at least six hours before a rally can be held. Only university students and personnel can attend the gatherings – members of the public are excluded – and students organising them will be held liable for any damages that occur.

Protest organisers were also advised to avoid sowing ‘division’ among the university community or causing unspecified damages to ‘international relations’.

However, the most contentious rule was a seemingly blanket ban on any mention of the monarchy “whether directly or indirectly” during a protest. The administration did not provide a reason for the prohibition.

Tags: No tags

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *